Members of the working group:
- Rob Okashimo – Director, Enterprise Risk Management
- Eve Stringham – Dean, Science and Technology
- Jerome Lesemann – Professor, Earth Sciences
- Emma Morrison – Fourth Year Student, Geography
- Kim Sharpe – Advisor, Health and Safety Services
- Matt Kellow – Coordinator, Outdoor Recreation
- Finn Meyer Cook – Professor, Social Work
- Trina Forrest – Coordinator, Risk Management
- Margot Croft – Admin Assistant, Environment & Sustainability
Short description of the working group mandate
The Strategic Plan: People, Place and Potential includes a commitment to the sustainable development goals as a cross cutting theme.
The Working Group on Risk, Opportunities, Adaptation and Mitigation is one of four working groups that will inform Vancouver Island University’s President’s Task Force on Climate Action and Sustainability. The Working Group will undertake a risk assessment associated to climate change to help inform preparation and mitigation strategies.
Summary of activities undertaken by the working group
The ROAM working group conducted bi-weekly meetings to develop and execute a work plan to:
a) identify and assess risks, vulnerabilities and opportunities for Vancouver Island University associated to climate change, and
b) identify required mitigation and adaptation strategies to manage the risks identified.
The process for conducting this work was informed by the ISO 31000 Risk Management Guidelines.
Scope, Context, Criteria
Determined by:
- The President’s Task Force on Climate Action and Sustainability
- VIU’s Strategic Plan: People, Place, Potential
- The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals
Risk Assessment
Risk Identification
Review of existing best practices and reports on climate change from North American, national, provincial, and local entities. Examples:
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – Sixth Assessment Report – Fact Sheet – North America
- Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy – Preliminary Strategic Climate Risk Assessment for British Columbia – July 2019
- City of Nanaimo – Climate Change Resilience Strategy – 2020
- City of Nanaimo – Hazard, Risk & Vulnerability Analysis – July-August 2014
- Cowichan Valley Regional District – Climate Change Adaptation and Risk Management Strategy – 2020
Risks that are unique to VIU were added based on ROAM members’ professional experience and feedback received from the Climate Action & Sustainability Task Force + Working Groups Summit.
The identified risks were consolidated into sixteen risk categories and sorted into four risk subcategories (see Table 1 – Climate Change Risk Categories.) More detailed descriptions of each risk including a definition, in-scope risk examples, and out-of-scope risk examples can be found in the Climate Change Risk Register (see Appendix.)
Table 1 - Climate Change Risk Categories
Risk Analysis
ROAM members submitted individual assessments of impact & likelihood for each risk, and the results were averaged. Likelihood is based on a 3-year timeframe to align with the university level risk assessment, which aligned with execution of the strategic plan through the foundation plans (see Table 2 - VIU Risk Assessment Impact and Likelihood Rating Scales.)
Table 2 - VIU Risk Assessment Impact and Likelihood Rating Scales
Risk Evaluation
Averaged risk impact and likelihood scores were plotted on a heat map (see Figure 1 - Climate Risk Exposure Heat Map for VIU.) Through discussion and debate by the working group, the risks were evaluated to review soundness of the results. The final evaluated results can be seen in Table 3 - Climate Change Risks by Risk Score (High to Low).
Communication & Consultation
Communication and consultation were conducted through working group meetings and the Climate Action & Sustainability Task Force + Working Groups Summit. The ROAM working group reached out to Indigenous representation in the VIU community for feedback on this risk assessment but had not received a response at the time of writing this report.
Figure 1 - Climate Risk Exposure Heat Map for VIU
Table 3 - Climate Change Risks by Risk Score (High to Low)
# |
Risk |
Subcategory |
Risk Score |
1 |
Severe Weather Events |
Direct Risks |
12.11 |
2 |
Financial |
Barriers to Mitigation |
11.81 |
3 |
Human Health & Wellbeing |
Consequential Impacts |
10.13 |
4 |
Infrastructure |
Consequential Impacts |
9.75 |
5 |
Water Security |
Direct Risks |
8.25 |
6 |
Politicization |
Barriers to Mitigation |
8.20 |
7 |
Economic Activity |
Consequential Impacts |
7.50 |
8 |
Values Misalignment |
Barriers to Mitigation |
7.42 |
9 |
Ocean Acidification |
Root Cause |
6.47 |
10 |
Air Quality |
Root Cause |
6.33 |
11 |
Ecosystem Balance |
Consequential Impacts |
6.23 |
12 |
Food Security |
Consequential Impacts |
5.63 |
13 |
Indigenous Peoples |
Consequential Impacts |
5.50 |
14 |
Global Warming |
Root Cause |
4.69 |
15 |
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) |
Barriers to Mitigation |
4.59 |
16 |
Sea Level Rise |
Direct Risks |
3.50 |
Analysis of insights gained by the working group:
Sixteen individual risks that contribute to climate change risk were identified and organized under four risk subcategories. Using a 3-year timeframe, a risk analysis determined that half of the risks have a high risk-level, and the remaining risks have a medium risk-level.
Table 4 - Climate Change Risk Categories with Risk Levels
Root Cause
The root cause of climate change is GHG emissions which cause or drive direct risks of climate change. GHG emissions have three identified risks to VIU including Ocean Acidification, Air Quality, and Global Warming. These risks have impact on our environment over a longer timeframe than the 3-year timeframe used in our risk analysis, so their lower likelihood in the short-term contributes to a risk level rating of medium.
Direct Risks
Direct risks are caused by GHG emission and lead to consequential impacts. Direct risks to VIU include Severe Weather Events, Water Security, and Sea Level Rise. Severe Weather and Water Security have high risk-levels and mitigating these risks should be a priority. Severe Weather risk has many components including drought, fire, flood, heat, landslides, and wind. These component risks may require further analysis to better mitigate this risk.
Consequential Impacts
Consequential impacts are WHY we need to mitigate the direct risks. The risks have the most direct impact on individuals in the VIU community. Human Health and Wellbeing, Infrastructure, and Economic Activity have high risk-levels and mitigating these risks should be a priority.
Although the Indigenous People’s risk was given a medium risk-level, this may be because its impact affects a smaller group of people. Additional consultation with Indigenous communities should be done to assess this risk and identify mitigation strategies.
Barriers to Mitigation
Barriers to Mitigation have the potential to prevent us from addressing the other risks identified. Financial, Politicization, and Values Misalignment have high risk-levels and mitigating these risks should be a priority.
Although the Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) risk was given a medium risk-level, this may be because its impact affects a smaller group of people. Additional consultation with marginalized communities should be done to assess this risk and identify mitigation strategies.
Potential Priorities for VIU:
- Form a committee/task force/working group to continue beyond the mandate of this task force and working group to manage these risks.
- Align the output of the other Climate Task Force Working Groups that relates to mitigation of climate change to the risks identified in this report.
- For Indigenous and EDI risks, the overall risk level score may not accurately reflect these risks due to the nature of the measurement tool.
a) Conduct a more focused risk assessment with these communities to do a comparison of results against the larger VIU community and to bring an Indigenous and EDI lens to the risk assessment.
b) Look externally how this is managed to put on equal footing.
Begin mitigating risks with a high risk level as per the risk assessment.
a) Prioritize the top high risks in each of the sub-categories: Severe Weather, Human Health and Well Being and Financial.
b) Bring an Indigenous and EDI lens to the risk mitigation options
5. All risks should be reviewed for potential “low hanging” mitigation or opportunities.
6. Conduct risk analysis with different time periods. Reconvene the WG to assess the risks using a longer time spans up to 25-year time span for the likelihood scale.
A 3-year timeframe was used to align with SMT risk analysis conducted in Q2 of 2022 which aligns with the foundation plan horizon.
b) Some climate change impacts span a longer time period than 3 years to materialize and therefore when considered in a short timeframe, the likelihood is low which gives an overall lower risk level exposure score.
c) Other external risk assessments have used multiple time periods of up to 25 years.
d) VIU has a long-term commitment to the Climate Action plan being developed.
e) This would identify risks where longer-term mitigation strategies can be applied.
7. Conduct this risk assessment on a bi-annual basis (every two years).
Climate change risks are dynamic, and the risk exposure is constantly changing.
b) As VIU manages some of these risks in a holistic way, the risk exposure for VIU will change.
8. Look at mitigation from multiple perspectives:
a) Prioritize mitigation tools that can also provide opportunities while managing the risk.
(e.g. VIU programing changes, which could add a competitive advantage.)
i. Investigate decision making models for measuring optimum risk mitigation strategies
b) Look at mitigations in terms of what is in VIU’s direct control (people, place, potential)
c) Look at mitigations in terms of what is in VIU’s indirect control (influence/advocacy)
d) Look externally for mitigation strategies and understand how VIU can contribute and/or benefit. (e.g. Where do we/can we fit in at a municipal, regional, provincial, federal, or global level.)
Recommendations:
Short-term (1-2 years):
Form a committee to continue beyond the mandate of this taskforce to manage Climate Change risks. This committee will:
-
- Align the output of the other Climate Taskforce Working Groups that relates to mitigation of climate change to the risks identified in this report.
- Engage with Indigenous and EDI communities.
- Begin mitigating risks with a high risk level as per the risk assessment.
- Review all risks for potential “low hanging” mitigation or opportunities.
- Conduct risk analysis with different time periods. (e.g. Up to 25 years)
- Look at mitigation from multiple perspectives.
Long-term (5+ years):
Continuation of the Climate Taskforce work, including bi-annual risk-assessments of climate change risk.
Appendix – Climate Change Risk Register
Risk |
Risk Category |
Description |
In Scope Examples |
Out of Scope Examples |
Next Steps (Mitigations/Opportunities/Comments) |
Average Impact |
Average Likelihood |
Average Risk-Level |
Air Quality |
Root Cause |
The risk of poor air quality adversely affecting VIU resources and programs. |
* Increase in severity and frequency of high Air Quality Index (AQI) ratings leading to unsafe working conditions, class cancellations, and/or VIU closures |
* Air quality’s effect on human health and wellbeing (Human Health & Wellbeing) |
* Providing clean, cool spaces for future potential heat domes. * We should be thinking about contingency plans for these kinds of events. Air filtration systems, facilities, staff and how this might work when these events occur |
1.88 |
3.38 |
6.33 |
Global Warming |
Root Cause |
The risk of VIU not reducing GHG emissions at expected rates |
* Inability to meet targets or demonstrate a decrease |
|
* Work from home; study from home * GHG Reductions as part of decision making * Geothermal exchange system and future expansion which reduces GHG emissions associated with building heating and cooling. * Progressive fleet electrification * Building envelope improvements when renovating existing buildings (follows BC Building/STEP Code for energy efficiency).
|
1.50 |
3.13 |
4.69 |
Ocean Acidification |
Root Cause |
The risk of increasing acidity in oceans |
* Estimated 0.15 reduction in pH by 2050 |
* Impacts on sea life leading to food shortages (Food Security) |
* Land-based Aquaculture |
2.25 |
2.88 |
6.47 |
Sea Level Rise |
Direct Impacts |
The risk that global warming will cause sea levels to rise, and coastal communities around Vancouver Island will be underwater |
* Loss of use of coastal land for programs and research |
* Severe storms and hurricanes affecting coastal communities (Severe Weather Events) |
* Education, research and outreach with municipal and indigenous governments/communities |
1.75 |
2.00 |
3.50 |
Severe Weather Events |
Direct Impacts |
The risk of an increase in frequency and severity of adverse weather events in British Columbia |
* Severe storms and wind storms |
* Building degradation – many of VIU’s buildings have a high FCI (Facility Condition Index) thus making them less resilient to extreme weather (Infrastructure) |
* Heating and cooling infrastructure deficit – no cooling in many buildings and unaffordable to resolve immediately * Remote study/work an opportunity for mitigation * White roofs/reflective roofing
|
3.13 |
3.88 |
12.11 |
Water Security (Quality & Quantity) |
Direct Impacts |
The risk of freshwater resources being used up or contaminated and VIU having to adapt to these changes |
* Heavy exploitation of limited water supplies – Reputational risk if VIU does not lead the way to reduce water usage |
* Irrigated agriculture’s lack of water leading to food production losses (Food Security) |
* Rainwater & greywater capture * landscaping & xeriscaping (A landscaping method that employs drought-resistant plants and special techniques to conserve water.) * Water as a commodity * Programs focussed on water protection and mediation * Technology for water treatment * Hydroponics agricultural programs * This is something we should be looking at as the RDN has done a lot to increase storage in our watershed and close to town. But rain water catchment or wells for VIU would be interesting to think on. |
2.75 |
3.00 |
8.25 |
Infrastructure |
Consequential Impacts |
The consequential risks from damage and loss of use of city resources on Vancouver Island |
* Infrastructure damage (ex. washout of highways that connect students to VIU campuses; damage to supply chains; damage to VIU buildings) |
* Loss of use of cities due to sea level rise (Sea Level Rise) |
* Densification – technology and vision * Role in technology around urban centres |
3.25 |
3.00 |
9.75 |
Economic Activity |
Consequential Impacts |
The risk of extreme events and climate hazards adversely affecting economic activities at VIU and surrounding regions |
* Disrupted supply chain infrastructure and trade |
|
* Consider tracking increased climate related costs by department –include this factor in projected budget lines. Include such costs in depreciation costs for infrastructure (foundations, roofs etc,
|
2.50 |
3.00 |
7.50 |
Ecosystem Balance |
Consequential Impacts |
The risk of rising air, water, ocean, and ground temperatures restructuring ecosystems and contributing to the redistribution and mortality of plant, fish, bird, mammal, and other faunal species |
* Altered ecological processes |
* Impact on crops, livestock, fisheries, and aquaculture leading to food production losses (Food Security) |
* Welcoming climate refugees - Human migration from tropical to temperate zones * Affective implications – SS; Faculty & Staff
|
2.38 |
2.63 |
6.23 |
Food Security |
Consequential Impacts |
The risk of climate induced redistribution and declines in local food production are a risk to food and nutritional security |
* Shift in agricultural and fishery suitability ranges leading to less growing land on the island, higher production and importation costs of food |
* Equitable distribution of limited food supplies to lower social economic groups (EDI) |
* Human immigration due to threats from food security * Alternative food source * Academic programs in agriculture at VIU * Support local procurement to support/incentivize food production * Partnerships with local food providers * VIU part of the provincial government’s Food Hub that supports increased purchase from local BC foods with an eye to strengthening food security. |
2.25 |
2.50 |
5.63 |
Human Health & Wellbeing |
Consequential Impacts |
The risk of rising temperatures negatively affecting human health and wellbeing for VIU community members |
* High temperatures increasing mortality and morbidity |
* Loss of life or wellbeing due to catastrophic weather events (Severe Weather Events) |
* Create Community Safety Hub in weather events * Develop a communications strategy for incoming students (student handbook, use of the Safety App, short orientation video messages etc, about the safety hubs) * Work from home/study online during worst air quality events
|
3.00 |
3.38 |
10.13 |
Indigenous Peoples |
Consequential Impacts |
The risk of higher impacts for Indigenous Peoples for whom culture, identity, commerce, health, and wellbeing are closely connected to a resilient environment |
* Indigenous cultural activities disrupted |
|
* 7 Generations lens on our vision & commitments – 2 eyed seeing * Consider hosting a learning circle at VIU with a set number of Indigenous people on the Island (from inside and outside VIU). Include those interested in sharing knowledge of climate action initiatives and helping provide VIU some direction on local engagement with First Nations /Metis communities and Indigenous led organizations on these issues over time. The learning circle group members will determine the scope of the group’s purpose, facilitation protocols, and the number and frequency of meetings. Commit resources to support the learning circle. Some of the learning circle events might take place as site visits to First Nations communities to see/learn from existing Indigenous initiatives. * Engage with Shq'apthut Student services re gathering student input on climate related mitigation /safety as well as opportunities for student engagement as changemakers. |
2.00 |
2.75 |
5.50 |
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) |
Barriers to Mitigation |
The risk of climate action not benefiting under-served VIU community members in an equitable, diverse, and inclusive manner |
* Insufficient current practices that fail to address EDI impacts of climate change |
* Risks impacting Indigenous Peoples (Indigenous Peoples) |
* Bring to EDI Steering Committee for comments
|
1.75 |
2.63 |
4.59 |
Financial |
Barriers to Mitigation |
The risk of not being able to mitigate risks due to financial constraints |
* Adequate upfront funding not available to begin mitigation projects * Ongoing funding not available to maintain mitigation efforts |
|
* Expand research and advise VIU on all untapped available funding pots (government, philanthropic etc). Also research to project cost-benefit analysis of different mitigation options (rain capture etc) * Consider untapped funding opportunities. E.g. see if VIUFA members would support an in-house climate action education fund (like the Steelworkers humanity fund) |
3.38 |
3.50 |
11.81 |
Values Misalignment |
Barriers to Mitigation |
The risk of conflicting values leading to a lack support for VIU’s climate action efforts from different critical entities |
* Misalignment of global community policies preventing implementation or undermining efforts of Canadian climate action efforts |
* Events derailing climate plans (ex. COVID) |
* Establish VIU as a Hub – Strategic Plan * More international collaborations and students * Nanaimo council donut model supportive framework * Align VIU with an international standard on climate change (eg ISO) |
2.38 |
3.13 |
7.42 |
Politicization |
Barriers to Mitigation |
The risk of politicization interfering with, delaying, or limiting VIU’s climate action initiatives |
* Internal VIU governance decisions to not take action or take different action than what is recommended |
|
* Convey a holistic approach align with strategic plan, recruitment, etc. |
2.63 |
3.13 |
8.20 |